Turfe

Turfe v. Turfe (In re Turfe)

Good Law
23 Cal. App. 5th 1118·233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 315
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2018B276665California3,958 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Edmon, J.

*1120 Robert Turfe (husband) appeals a judgment of dissolution of marriage as to status only. The judgment terminated his marriage to Summer Turfe (wife) and reserved jurisdiction over all other issues. 1

Husband contends the trial court erred in denying his request for an annulment. He asserts wife defrauded him by falsely promising at the time of the marriage to be bound by the "mahr agreement" that they entered into in accordance with Islamic law. 2 The parties' mahr agreement provided that wife would receive a copy of the Quran in the event of a divorce. The parties disagree as to whether the mahr agreement precluded wife from obtaining any other property in the event of a divorce, and the expert testimony at trial *317 was in conflict with respect to the proper interpretation of the mahr agreement.

Following a bifurcated trial, the trial court concluded that it was not persuaded by clear and convincing evidence that wife had intentionally misrepresented her intention to be bound by the mahr agreement in order to induce husband to enter into the marriage. Instead, the trial court found that the parties simply had different interpretations of the mahr agreement, which they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.