People v. Roderick Wash.

Good Law
23 Cal. App. 5th 948·233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 599
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 2018B284474California3,103 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Rubin, J.

*600 *951 Roderick Washington filed a petition for reclassification under Proposition 47, the Safe Neighborhood and Schools Act (Proposition 47), asking that his second degree burglary conviction be reclassified as a misdemeanor. The trial court summarily denied the petition on the ground that a burglary with the intent to commit identity theft does not constitute "shoplifting" under Proposition 47.

On appeal, petitioner contends, respondent concedes, and we agree that a burglary with the intent to commit identity theft may meet the statutory definition of shoplifting under Proposition 47. However, respondent argues that the court's summary denial of the petition was correct because petitioner did not meet his initial burden of proof. Respondent argues that a Proposition 47 petitioner has the initial burden of showing three things: (1) he did not intend to commit a theft of property exceeding $950, (2) he did not intend to commit a nontheft felony, and (3) the value of the stolen property did not exceed $950.

We conclude that legal authorities only support respondent's third characterization of a petitioner's initial burden under Proposition 47. We further conclude that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.