People v. Lee

Good Law
233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715·24 Cal. App. 5th 50
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2018A146214California3,643 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Stewart, J.

*53 At issue in this case is the availability of restitution for noneconomic losses to certain victims of child sex abuse, under a *718 prior version of Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (f)(3)(F) that was effective until December 31, 2017. 1

Although an award of restitution to crime victims ordinarily must be limited to economic losses, former section 1202.4, subdivision (f)(3)(F) required an award of restitution for noneconomic losses "for felony violations of Section 288." (Stats. 2012, ch. 873, § 1.) Section 288 criminalizes lewd and lascivious conduct toward children under the age of 14 and, in some instances, under the age of 16. (See § 288, subds. (a), (c)(1).)

In this case, defendant Franklin Lee pled no contest to multiple felony counts stemming from his sexual exploitation of a minor over a period of many years. There was no separate count alleging a violation of section 288. There was, however, a charge he engaged in continuous sexual abuse of a child in violation of Penal Code section 288.5. That statute makes it a felony for certain persons, over a period of at least three months, to engage in three or more acts of lewd and lascivious conduct prohibited by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.