Bushansky

Bushansky v. Soon-Shiong

Good Law
23 Cal. App. 5th 1000·234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 54
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 2018D072213California4,179 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dato, J.

*1003 Plaintiff Stephen Bushansky filed a shareholder derivative action in San Diego Superior Court on behalf of nominal defendant NantKwest, Inc. Based on a forum selection provision contained in NantKwest's certificate of incorporation that generally designates Delaware as the forum for shareholder derivative actions, the trial court dismissed Bushansky's suit.

On appeal, Bushansky argues that the forum selection provision was never triggered since a condition precedent to its operation was never met. That condition requires that Delaware courts have personal jurisdiction over all indispensable parties named as defendants. Since Delaware courts lacked jurisdiction over one of the defendants at the time the action was filed in California, Bushansky urges that the condition was not met and, thus, the forum selection provision was not triggered.

The provision, however, does not specify that personal jurisdiction must be determined as of the date an action is filed and no later. In fact, it is silent as to when personal jurisdiction in Delaware must exist. Faced with that silence, we-in accord with a well-established principle of contract law-presume that the parties intended a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.