Camacho

Camacho v. Target Corp.

Good Law
234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 223·24 Cal. App. 5th 291
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 8, 2018D073280California7,825 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Aaron, J.

*226 *293 I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Adrian Camacho appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Target Corporation (Target) on Camacho's causes of action for discrimination based on sexual orientation, harassment causing a hostile work environment, failure to prevent harassment and discrimination, retaliation, constructive termination in violation of public policy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent hiring, supervision, and retention, and a violation of the Bane Act ( Civ. Code, § 52.1 ). The trial court concluded that language included in an addendum to a preprinted compromise and release form utilized to settle Camacho's workers' compensation action against Target constituted a broad release of any and all potential claims that *294 Camacho may have had against Target, including claims falling outside the workers' compensation system.

After reviewing the relevant language in the addendum and considering that language in the context of the entire settlement agreement, we conclude that the trial court erred in determining that certain language contained in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.