Saint Francis Mem'l Hosp. v. Cal. Dep't of Pub. Health

Good Law
234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 360·24 Cal. App. 5th 617
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2018A150545California2,811 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Humes, J.

*362 *619 Saint Francis Memorial Hospital (Saint Francis) petitioned for a writ of administrative mandate after being fined by the California Department of Public Health (Department). The trial court sustained the Department's demurrer based on the statute of limitations, and judgment was entered in the Department's favor. On appeal, Saint Francis argues that the court erred by sustaining the demurrer because the petition was timely under the applicable statutes, the limitations period was equitably tolled, and the Department is equitably estopped from claiming the petition was filed late. We affirm.

*620 I.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case arose after surgical staff at Saint Francis left a sponge in a patient during the patient's back surgery in 2010. The patient was required to endure a second surgery and be treated with powerful intravenous antibiotics. As a result of this incident, the Department imposed a $50,000 fine on Saint Francis for not having appropriate sponge-count policies and for not effectively training on, and ensuring compliance with, such policies. Saint Francis challenged the fine, and a hearing was held before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.