Krolikowski

Krolikowski v. San Diego City Employees' Ret. Sys.

Good Law
234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 499·24 Cal. App. 5th 537
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2018D071119California14,204 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Irion, J.

*504 *543 Appellants Vincent Krolikowski and Connie Van Putten (collectively appellants) are former employees of the City of San Diego (the City) and members of the San Diego City Employees' Retirement System (SDCERS) who receive monthly pension payments from SDCERS, the administrator of the City's pension plan. Krolikowski and Van Putten separately filed lawsuits against SDCERS after SDCERS discovered an error in calculating their monthly pension benefits and took action to recoup the past overpayments. In their now-consolidated lawsuits, Krolikowski and Van Putten assert causes of action for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, writ of mandate ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1085 ) and declaratory relief, all of which challenge SDCERS's ability to implement a recoupment procedure to collect the overpayments from Krolikowski and Van Putten. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of SDCERS.

Krolikowski and Van Putten contend that the trial court erred in (1) sustaining SDCERS's demurrer to the conversion and breach of fiduciary *544 duty causes of action; and (2) finding in favor of SDCERS after conducting a bench trial on the remaining causes of action for writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.