Lo

Lo v. Lee

Good Law
234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 824·24 Cal. App. 5th 1065
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2018A151603California3,016 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dondero, J.

*1069 Plaintiff David Lo, individually and as the assignee of plaintiffs Danny F.M. Lo and Alice M.C. Lo (collectively referred to as plaintiffs), appeals from an order of dismissal entered in favor of defendant Tristan You after the trial court sustained You's demurrer without leave to amend. Plaintiff contends the trial court should have overruled the demurrer because he stated a viable cause of action for fraudulent conveyance against You for college tuition payments made on You's behalf by his debtor father. On our de novo review, we conclude the demurrer was properly sustained. We thus affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Commencing in December 2006, plaintiffs made several loans to defendant Daniel S. Lee, who is You's father. 1 Lee defaulted on the loans.

On July 15, 2013, an amended judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs against *826 Lee for $1,143,576. No part of the judgment debt has been paid.

On October 11, 2016, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (FAC) seeking to set aside allegedly fraudulent conveyances and seeking an accounting. The complaint was filed against Lee and You.

According to the FAC, between June 10, 2013, and November 18,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.