Willhide-Michiulis

Willhide-Michiulis v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC

Good Law
235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716·25 Cal. App. 5th 344
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2018C082306California10,157 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Robie, J.

*347 Plaintiff Kathleen Willhide-Michiulis was involved in a tragic snowboarding accident at Mammoth Mountain Ski Area. On her last run of the day, she collided with a snowcat pulling a snow-grooming tiller and got caught in the tiller. The accident resulted in the amputation of her left leg, several skull fractures and facial lacerations, among other serious injuries. She and her husband, Bruno Michiulis, appeal after the trial court granted defendant Mammoth Mountain Ski Area's (Mammoth) motion for summary judgment finding the operation of the snowcat and snow-grooming tiller on the snow run open to the public was an inherent risk of snowboarding and did not constitute gross negligence. Plaintiffs contend the trial court improperly granted Mammoth's motion for summary judgment and improperly excluded the expert declarations plaintiffs submitted to oppose the motion. They also assert the trial court improperly denied their motion to transfer venue to Los Angeles County.

We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the expert declarations. Further, although snowcats and snow-grooming tillers are capable of causing catastrophic injury, as evidenced by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.