Time Warner Cable Inc. v. Cnty. of L. A.

Good Law
235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 867·25 Cal. App. 5th 457
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 2018B270062California5,572 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Johnson, J.

*461 Time Warner Cable (Time Warner) operates a cable system that uses public rights-of-way in Los Angeles to provide cable television, 1 broadband, and telephone services. Time Warner initially only provided television services. Once changing technologies enabled broadband and telephone services to be delivered over cable rights-of-way, Time Warner and many other cable operators began to provide their customers broadband and telephone services over these same rights-of-way.

*870 Time Warner's right to use the public rights-of-way and to conduct business as a television cable operator are conferred via cable television franchise agreements with numerous local franchising authorities. The right to use the public rights-of-way (the possessory interest) is a taxable interest; the right to do business as a cable operator is not. The fee for these franchises is, by federal law, limited to no more than five percent of revenue generated from the provision of television services only. 2 Federal law also prohibits local franchising authorities from granting exclusive franchises.

The issues before us stem from a dispute between the parties as to how the County of Los Angeles (the County)…

dissent Opinion

Chaney, J.

*878 I join in all of the majority opinion except Part D(1) of the Discussion portion, from which I respectfully dissent.

*472 The Constitution directs that all real property be assessed as a percentage of "fair market value." ( Cal. Const., art. XIII, § 1.) For tax purposes, "property" includes a right-of-way granted to a cable service provider by a public entity ( Cox Cable San Diego, Inc. v. County of San Diego (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 368 , 378, 229 Cal.Rptr. 839 ) but not the right to provide the cable service itself ( Shubat v. Sutter County Assessment Appeals Bd. (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 794 , 801, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 1 ; see Rev. & Tax. Code, § 107.7, subd. (d) ).

"Fair market value" means the value a willing buyer would pay to a willing seller in an open market. ( Rev. & Tax. Code, § 110, subd. (a) [" 'fair market value' means the amount of cash or its equivalent that property would bring if exposed for sale in the open market"]; Kaiser Co. v. Reid (1947) 30 Cal.2d 610 , 623, 184 P.2d 879 .) Property is therefore assessed based on the value that a hypothetical buyer would pay for it in the marketplace, "not the taxpayer's peculiar benefits ... unrelated to the market." ( Mola Dev.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.