Fluidmaster, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Good Law
235 Cal. Rptr. 3d 889·25 Cal. App. 5th 545
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 2018G055469California3,711 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Bedsworth, J.

*890 *547 I. INTRODUCTION

The law firm of Crowell & Moring (Crowell) was vicariously disqualified from this insurance coverage action based on a newly-hired, but disqualified discovery associate in a geographically distant office. Then, while the disqualification appeal was pending in this court, the associate left Crowell. At that point, Kirk v. First American Title Ins. Co. (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 776 , 108 Cal.Rptr.3d 620 ( Kirk ) became the controlling authority. Kirk also involved a disqualified attorney who left a vicariously disqualified law firm during the pendency of an appeal, and the result was that the order of disqualification had to be reversed and remanded back for reconsideration by *548 the trial court. In the process Kirk outlined a number of factors that controlled the case on remand with regard to the efficacy of what is called an ethical screen in retroactively deciding whether any of a former client's confidential communications had been actually disclosed. We now follow Kirk and reverse the disqualification order and return the case to the trial court with directions to reevaluate its disqualification decision in light of Kirk -specifically the Kirk factors…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.