Johnson v. Cnty. of Mendocino

Good Law
236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 444·25 Cal. App. 5th 1017
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 8, 2018A152004California6,613 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Kline, J.

*1019 This appeal arises out of a challenge to the validity of a Mendocino County ballot measure, Measure AI, which imposed a tax on commercial cannabis businesses (Mendocino County Code, § 6.32.010 et seq.) and which was approved by a simple majority of county voters. Michael Johnson, Pebbles Trippet, Terry Johnson, Noel Manners, Paula Deeter, Ron Edwards, and Ralf Laguna (plaintiffs) appeal the trial *446 court's order of dismissal after the court sustained the demurrer of the County of Mendocino (County) without leave to amend and denied plaintiffs' motion *1020 for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs contend that under a correct interpretation of article XIII of the California Constitution (article XIII), the tax imposed pursuant to Measure AI was not a general tax but, together with a related advisory measure, amounted to a special tax requiring approval by a supermajority of county voters. In the alternative, plaintiffs contend Measure AI did not involve a tax at all, and instead imposed an unlawful fee. We shall affirm the court's order of dismissal.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On February 6, 2017, plaintiffs filed a complaint against the County, requesting declarations that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.