Protect Niles v. City of Fremont
Opinion
lead Opinion
Bruiniers, J.
*1134 The City of Fremont (City) approved a residential and retail development (Project) in its Niles historical district over considerable neighborhood opposition. The City adopted a mitigated negative declaration after finding the Project as mitigated would have no significant adverse environmental impact. Protect Niles 1 petitioned for a writ of mandamus ordering the City to overturn the project approvals and prepare an environmental impact report. The trial court granted the petition after finding substantial evidence supported a fair argument of significant adverse impacts on *517 aesthetics (incompatibility with the historical district) and traffic. We affirm.
We conclude the Project's compatibility with the historical district is properly analyzed as aesthetic impacts, and we find substantial evidence in this record supports a fair argument of a significant aesthetic impact of the Project on the Niles historical district. We also conclude the record contains substantial evidence supporting a fair argument of significant traffic impacts, notwithstanding a professional traffic study concluding the anticipated adverse impacts fell below the City's predetermined thresholds of…