Protect Niles v. City of Fremont

Good Law
236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 513·25 Cal. App. 5th 1129
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2018A151645California9,344 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

*1134 The City of Fremont (City) approved a residential and retail development (Project) in its Niles historical district over considerable neighborhood opposition. The City adopted a mitigated negative declaration after finding the Project as mitigated would have no significant adverse environmental impact. Protect Niles 1 petitioned for a writ of mandamus ordering the City to overturn the project approvals and prepare an environmental impact report. The trial court granted the petition after finding substantial evidence supported a fair argument of significant adverse impacts on *517 aesthetics (incompatibility with the historical district) and traffic. We affirm.

We conclude the Project's compatibility with the historical district is properly analyzed as aesthetic impacts, and we find substantial evidence in this record supports a fair argument of a significant aesthetic impact of the Project on the Niles historical district. We also conclude the record contains substantial evidence supporting a fair argument of significant traffic impacts, notwithstanding a professional traffic study concluding the anticipated adverse impacts fell below the City's predetermined thresholds of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.