Ehret

Ehret v. Winco Foods, LLC

Good Law
236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 572·26 Cal. App. 5th 1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2018E067575California3,188 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

RAMIREZ P. J.

*573 *3 Plaintiffs Kristina Parker 1 and Elmer Gillett (collectively the Employees) were employees of WinCo Foods, LLC and/or WinCo Holdings, Inc. (collectively WinCo). They do not dispute that they were subject to a collective bargaining agreement which at least purported to provide that an employee who works a shift of not more than six hours is not entitled to a meal break.

The Employees filed this action claiming, among other things, that WinCo was violating Labor Code section 512, subdivision (a). This statute provides that an employee who works more than five hours is entitled to a meal break, "except that if the total work period per day of the employee is no more than six hours, the meal period may be waived by mutual consent of both the employer and employee." The trial court ruled that the collective bargaining agreement waived the Employees' statutory right to a meal break whenever they worked more than five but not more than six hours.

The Employees appeal. They contend that the trial court erred because the waiver in the collective bargaining agreement was not "clear and unmistakable," as required by federal law. We will hold that the waiver was clear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.