Cal. Dep't of Indus. Relations, Div. of Occupational Safety & Health v. Cal. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd.

Good Law
236 Cal. Rptr. 3d 706·26 Cal. App. 5th 93
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 13, 2018A142799California6,113 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Reardon, J.

*96 In this appeal, we consider a narrow question of regulatory interpretation: Can the interior of a non-air-conditioned bus be deemed an "outdoor place of employment" for purposes of the heat illness prevention standards promulgated by the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Standards Board) as stated in section 3395 of title 8 of the California Code of Regulations ( section 3395 )? After the Department *97 of Industrial Relation's Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Division) cited the Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) for several violations of section 3395 involving its non-air-conditioned buses, AC Transit sought administrative review, arguing, among other things, that the buses were not "outdoor" places of employment for purposes of the heat illness prevention regulation. The Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board (Appeals Board) ultimately agreed, affirming the dismissal of the appealed-from violations by one of its administrative law judges (ALJ). However, after the Division filed a petition for writ of mandate in the trial court disputing this decision, the trial court determined that the Appeals Board's definition of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.