Carter

People v. Carter

Good Law
237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 642·26 Cal. App. 5th 985
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 2018C074051California6,037 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hull, J.

Defendant Richard Tyrell Carter claims cruel and unusual punishment (U.S. Const., Eighth Amend.) in his sentence of 55 years to life in prison for a second-degree murder he committed at age 17, with personal use and discharge of a firearm causing death, possession of a firearm by a felon, and a prior strike conviction for robbery. ( Pen. Code, §§ 187, 12022.53, subd. (d), 12021, subd. (a)(1), 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12 ; unless otherwise stated, statutory references that follow are to the Penal Code.) The Attorney General acknowledges this sentence is the functional equivalent of a sentence of life in prison without possibility of parole (LWOP). ( People v. Franklin (2016) 63 Cal.4th 261 , 268, 202 Cal.Rptr.3d 496 , 370 P.3d 1053 ( Franklin ) [trial court may not sentence juvenile to functional equivalent of LWOP for homicide offense without Eighth Amendment protections outlined by United States Supreme Court].)

This appeal is not rendered moot by 2013 legislation affording parole hearings for juveniles with life sentences (§§ 3046, 3051, 4801; Stats. 2013, ch. 312, § 4 (Sen. Bill No. 260); Franklin, supra , 63 Cal.4th 261 , 202 Cal.Rptr.3d 496 , 370 P.3d 1053 ), because the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.