Martine

Martine v. Heavenly Valley Ltd. P'ship

Good Law
238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 237·27 Cal. App. 5th 715
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 4, 2018C076998California4,927 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hull, J.

Plaintiff Teresa Martine (Martine) hurt her knee while skiing at Heavenly Valley Ski Resort and was being helped down the mountain by a ski patrolman when the rescue sled in which she was riding went out of control and hit a tree. Martine sued resort owner Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership (Heavenly) for negligence and for damages arising from her injuries.

Heavenly moved for summary judgment arguing that there was no evidence that its employee, a ski patrolman named Gustav Horn (Horn) had been negligent in taking Martine down the mountain thus causing the sled to hit the tree and that, in any event, Martine's action is barred by the doctrine of primary assumption of risk.

The trial court granted Heavenly's motion and entered judgment accordingly. Martine appeals.

As we understand her arguments on appeal, Martine asserts: (1) there is evidence *240 on the motion to support Martine's claim that the ski patroller Horn was negligent; (2) her action is not barred by the doctrine of primary assumption of risk; (3) the trial court erred in not allowing her to amend her complaint to allege negligence and damages arising from a second injury she incurred the same day while being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.