Brown

Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co.

Good Law
239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 519·28 Cal. App. 5th 824
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2018B278911California7,325 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Seigle, J.

*829 I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Terri Brown brought a representative action against her employer, Ralphs Grocery Company (Ralphs), and its parent company, The Kroger Co. (collectively defendants), under the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698, et seq. ), alleging wage and hour violations. In 2009, plaintiff filed with the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA) a notice of alleged Labor Code violations, as required under Labor Code section 2699.3, subdivision (a) as a condition of filing a PAGA action, and filed her complaint in this action alleging PAGA claims. Thereafter, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint alleging new violations of different Labor Code provisions not specified in her 2009 notice.

Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings arguing the 2009 notice was deficient, *523 which the trial court granted with leave to amend the notice and the complaint. In March 2016, plaintiff amended her notice and filed a third amended complaint.

Defendants demurred to the third amended complaint, which was sustained by the trial court. The trial court held that the PAGA claims were barred because the 2009 notice was deficient…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.