Garcia

People v. Garcia

Bad Law
239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 558·28 Cal. App. 5th 961
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 1, 2018E068490California4,209 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fields, J.

*561 I. INTRODUCTION

Following a jury trial, defendant and appellant, Richard Garcia, was convicted of first degree residential burglary. ( Pen. Code, § 459.) 1 Defendant admitted having one prior strike/prior serious felony conviction and one prison prior, and he was sentenced to 14 years in prison, including a five-year consecutive term based on his prior serious felony conviction. (§ 667, subd. (a)

*965 (hereafter § 667(a) ).) 2 In this appeal, defendant claims the court abused its discretion and deprived him of his due process right to present a defense by excluding the expert testimony of Dr. Robert Shomer concerning the reliability of eyewitness identifications. We find no merits to these claims. But we remand the matter for resentencing pursuant to Senate Bill No. 1393 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) (S.B. 1393). S.B. 1393 amends sections 667(a) and 1385, subdivision (b) (hereafter § 1385(b) ), effective January 1, 2019, to give courts discretion to dismiss or strike a prior serious felony conviction for sentencing purposes. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.

II. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Prosecution Evidence

Around 10:30 a.m. on April 25, 2014, Richard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.