Schmidt

Schmidt v. CitiBank, N.A.

Caution
239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 648·28 Cal. App. 5th 1109
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 7, 2018D072993California6,036 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aaron, J.

*1112 I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs David and Hedda Schmidt appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants Citibank, N.A., as Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust 2007-AR3 Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2007-AR3, and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (defendants).

The Schmidts filed this action against the defendants, alleging violations of the Homeowners' Bill of Rights (HBOR; Civ. Code, §§ 2923.55, 2923.6 ) and Business and Professions Code section 17200, and seeking to prevent the completion of a trustee's sale of their residence.

The defendants moved for summary judgment and presented evidence of extensive and numerous telephone calls between the Schmidts and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., the loan servicer, during which the Schmidts' financial situation was discussed, as were possible options to avoid foreclosure. The trial court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and entered judgment in their favor.

On appeal, the Schmidts contend that summary judgment should not have been granted because there remain triable issues of fact to be determined. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.