Quiles

Quiles v. Parent

Bad Law
239 Cal. Rptr. 3d 664·28 Cal. App. 5th 1000
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 2, 2018G054353California7,238 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Fybel, J.

*1004 INTRODUCTION

In this latest chapter in what originated as a wage and hour class action, defendant Arthur J. Parent, Jr. (Parent) appeals from the amended judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Amanda Quiles on her individual claim for wrongful employment termination in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA; 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ). (All further statutory references are to title 29 of the United States Code unless otherwise specified.) In addition to the damages awarded by the jury, the amended judgment awarded Quiles $689,310.04 in attorney fees and $50,591.69 in costs of litigation.

Parent challenges the attorney fees and costs awards of the amended judgment only, arguing the trial court erred by awarding costs that were not statutorily authorized and by awarding attorney fees and costs that were jointly incurred by Quiles with her coplaintiffs for whom litigation remains pending. He also argues the trial court otherwise abused its discretion by awarding attorney fees and costs *667 that were unrelated and unnecessary to Quiles's successful FLSA claim.

We affirm. We hold, in this case of first impression, that federal law applies to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.