Alcazar
Alcazar v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Johnson, J.
*865 *88 Edgar A. Alcazar (Edgar), a minor, allegedly suffered severe and permanent injuries when he fell from the branch of a tree located on the campus of his middle school. By and through his guardian ad litem, Edgar sued the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). A jury found in favor of LAUSD on all of Edgar's claims.
On appeal, Edgar advances two arguments for why he is entitled to a new trial; both arguments relate to the jury selection process, which ultimately involved three venires. First, Edgar argues that the trial court erred when, following the first venire, it refused to allow counsel to make mini-opening statements to the second and third venires and prohibited counsel from referring to the specific facts of the case during the balance of voir dire. Second, Edgar contends that the trial court erred by refusing to remove two jurors for cause.
We are not persuaded by either of Edgar's arguments. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
On May 7, 2013, shortly after lunch began at Edgar's middle school, the principal received a radio call that "something had happened."
A minute or two after receiving the call, the principal arrived at the scene and…