C.A.

C.A. v. C.P.

Good Law
240 Cal. Rptr. 3d 38·29 Cal. App. 5th 27
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 13, 2018C084473California6,168 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Duarte, J.

*30 This case involves a little girl bonded to and loved by each of her three parents.

The wife in a married couple (defendants C.P. and J.P., wife and husband) conceived the child with a coworker (plaintiff C.A.), but hid that fact from wife's employer and--initially--from husband. The marriage remains intact and wife and husband parent the child. For the first three years of the child's life, the couple allowed plaintiff to act in an alternate parenting role, and the child bonded with him and his close relatives. Defendants excluded plaintiff from the child's life when he filed the instant petition seeking legal confirmation of his paternal rights. The trial court found that wife misled the court at an interim custody hearing, prolonging what the court later viewed as an unwarranted separation. Despite this period of separation, the court found the child was still bonded to all three parents and found this to be a "rare" case where, pursuant to statutory authority, each of three parents should be legally recognized as such, to prevent detriment to their child. Defendants appeal. We shall affirm.

*31 BACKGROUND

The child was born in July 2012 to wife, who was then and remains…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.