Hamilton

People v. Hamilton

Good Law
241 Cal. Rptr. 3d 765·30 Cal. App. 5th 673
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 21, 2018D073034California6,529 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Irion, J.

*675 A jury convicted former United States Postal Service employee Robert L. Hamilton of three counts of making a false or fraudulent statement *676 for the purpose of obtaining compensation under the California workers' compensation law in violation of Insurance Code section 1871.4, subdivision (a)(1).

Hamilton makes two arguments on appeal. First, he contends that because, as a federal employee, his workers' compensation benefits were provided under the Federal Employment Compensation Act ( 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101 - 8152 ) (FECA), the doctrine of federal preemption bars him from being prosecuted under California law for any offense alleging fraud in obtaining federal workers' compensation benefits under FECA. Second, Hamilton contends that regardless of whether the prosecution is preempted, insufficient evidence supports his conviction under Insurance Code section 1871.4, subdivision (a)(1) because that statute applies only to false or fraudulent statements made for the purpose of obtaining compensation afforded under the California workers' compensation law, which was not applicable to him as a federal employee.

On the issue of federal preemption, we conclude that Hamilton has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.