Meraz

People v. Meraz

Good Law
242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1·30 Cal. App. 5th 768
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 2018B245657California6,930 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bigelow, J.

*770 Codefendants Juan Ramon Meraz, Juan M. Chambasis, and Victor Bibiano separately appeal their convictions and sentences for murder, attempted murder, and discharging a firearm at an inhabited dwelling following a gang-related shooting that killed two victims and seriously injured a third. This is our third opinion in this case. In our first opinion, we affirmed the judgments with certain corrections to their sentences. The California Supreme Court granted review and transferred the case to us for *771 reconsideration of defendants' confrontation clause challenges to the gang expert's testimony in light of People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 , 204 Cal.Rptr.3d 102 , 374 P.3d 320 ( Sanchez ). In a partially published opinion, we again affirmed the judgments as modified. ( People v. Meraz (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 1162 , 212 Cal.Rptr.3d 81 .)

Appellants once again sought review. The California Supreme Court denied Chambasis's petition, but granted Meraz's and Bibiano's petitions and held the cases pending disposition in two other cases raising issues related to sentencing juveniles to life without parole. The court specifically ordered that our prior opinion remain precedential. (…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.