Begian

Begian v. Sarajian (In re Begian)

Good Law
242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 692·31 Cal. App. 5th 506
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 2018B278316California4,744 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Egerton, J.

*508 INTRODUCTION

*694 Family Code section 852, subdivision (a) 1 ( section 852(a) ) provides that a "transmutation," or an interspousal transaction changing the character of community or separate property, "is not valid unless made in writing by an *509 express declaration " by the adversely affected spouse. (Italics added.) In Estate of MacDonald (1990) 51 Cal.3d 262 , 272 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 794 P.2d 911 ( MacDonald ), our Supreme Court held that a writing satisfies the "express declaration" requirement only if it states on its face that "the characterization or ownership of the property is being changed." ( Id. at p. 272, 272 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 794 P.2d 911 .) The MacDonald court also made clear that its construction of section 852(a) precludes the use of extrinsic evidence to prove an ambiguous writing effected a transmutation. ( Id. at p. 264, 272 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 794 P.2d 911 ; In re Marriage of Benson (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1096 , 1100, 32 Cal.Rptr.3d 471 , 116 P.3d 1152 ( Benson ).)

In this case we must decide whether a "Trust Transfer Deed," signed by Richard Begian, granting certain real property to his wife, Ida Sarajian, met section 852(a) 's express declaration requirement. 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.