Symmonds

Symmonds v. Mahoney

Good Law
243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 445·31 Cal. App. 5th 1096
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 1, 2019B283529California7,039 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bendix, J.

*1099 Defendants Edward Joseph Mahoney, also known as Eddie Money, and Eddie Money Entertainment, Inc. (collectively, defendants) 1 appeal from the trial court's order denying a special motion to strike under *449 Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute.

Mahoney is a singer and songwriter who performs in concerts across the country. In 2015 he terminated his drummer, plaintiff and respondent Glenn Symmonds, who subsequently sued defendants for discrimination on the basis of age, disability, and medical condition. Defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion arguing that Mahoney's decision as to which musicians performed with him was an act in furtherance of the exercise of his constitutional right of free speech in connection with an issue of public interest, and thus protected under section 425.16.

The trial court denied the motion, finding that Symmonds' cause of action arose from defendants' discriminatory conduct, not the decision to terminate him, and thus Symmonds' claim did not implicate Mahoney's free speech rights.

We hold that defendants met their burden to establish that Mahoney's decision to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.