Alvarez

People v. Alvarez

Good Law
244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 605·32 Cal. App. 5th 1267
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 2019A152349California3,310 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Siggins, J.

*1269 May a criminal defendant confined in a state mental hospital pursuant to a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) issue subpoenas duces tecum against the hospital and hospital police when there is no underlying active proceeding, motion or petition? No. We conclude, as did the trial court, that in the absence of any such proceedings the court's continuing jurisdiction over NGI cases does not support a generalized right of defendants to promulgate discovery to third parties unrelated to any active legal matter. We therefore affirm the trial court's order quashing the subpoenas duces tecum at issue.

BACKGROUND

In 2008 Jose Alvarez pled not guilty by reason of insanity to felony assault with a firearm on a firefighter or peace officer, with a firearm enhancement, and was committed to Napa State Hospital for a maximum commitment term of 18 years. His case thereafter remained largely inactive other than for the submission of periodic reports pursuant to Penal Code section 1026, subdivision (f).

In June 2017, Alvarez's attorney issued subpoenas to Napa State Hospital and the Napa State Hospital Police under Alvarez's 2008 criminal case number. The subpoena served on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.