Barenborg

Barenborg v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity

Good Law
244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 680·33 Cal. App. 5th 70
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2019B289766California6,482 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Manella, J.

INTRODUCTION

Appellant Carson Barenborg was injured at a party hosted by a local chapter of respondent Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity, a national fraternity. Appellant sued respondent for negligence. The trial court granted respondent's motion for summary judgment, concluding respondent owed appellant no duty of care and was not vicariously liable for its local chapter's actions.

Appellant challenges these conclusions on appeal. She contends respondent owed her a duty of care based on: (1) a special relationship between respondent and the local chapter; (2) a special relationship between respondent and appellant; and (3) a voluntary assumption of duty under the negligent undertaking doctrine. She also contends respondent is vicariously liable for the local chapter's actions based on an agency relationship. We hold that respondent owed no duty to protect appellant from the actions of the local chapter and is not vicariously liable for them. We therefore affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. The National Fraternity

Respondent is a non-profit corporation operating as a national fraternal organization.

*684 Based in Illinois, respondent has over 200 local chapters and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.