Jarvis

Jarvis v. Jarvis

Good Law
244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 722·33 Cal. App. 5th 113
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2019H044930California11,969 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Greenwood, J.

Appellant Jarvis Properties is a limited partnership that owns a two-acre parcel of land. Its two general partners-appellant Todd Henry Jarvis and respondent James Alvin Jarvis (brothers)-each own a 50 percent interest in the partnership, which is less than the majority consent required *725 to act on behalf of the partnership ( Corp. Code, § 15904.06, subd. (a) ). The general partners cannot agree on what to do about the two-acre parcel and their partnership agreement does not address the question of what occurs in the event of a decision-making deadlock. They have, therefore, turned to the courts.

James Jarvis filed an action for partition by sale, naming Todd Jarvis and Jarvis Properties as defendants. 1 Todd hired a lawyer to represent him in the partition action; he also hired a separate lawyer, William Roscoe, III, to represent the partnership. Both Todd and the partnership filed demurrers. James objected to having Roscoe represent the partnership and filed a motion to disqualify Roscoe on the ground that Roscoe was not authorized to act by the requisite majority of the general partners. James was concerned that Roscoe-who took the position that he was not subject to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.