Bevis

Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP

Bad Law
244 Cal. Rptr. 3d 797·33 Cal. App. 5th 230
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2019D071849; D072825California15,525 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McConnell, J.

INTRODUCTION

Sixty-nine current and former residents of mobilehome park Terrace View Mobile Home Estates (Terrace View or the park) filed the present lawsuit against the park's owners, Terrace View Partners, LP, Thomas T. Tatum, Jeffrey A. Kaplan, and management company, Mobile Community Management Company (collectively, defendants). The operative first amended complaint, styled as a class action, included 12 causes of action based on allegations that defendants' failure to maintain the park in "good working order and condition" created a nuisance that, along with unreasonably high space rent increases, made it difficult or impossible for park residents to sell their mobilehomes. After the court denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification, the parties and the court agreed to try the case in phases, with the first phase involving 16 residents living in 10 spaces in Terrace View.

*801 A jury in the first phase returned a special verdict finding defendants liable and awarding the individual plaintiffs economic and noneconomic damages under the following causes of action or theories, as they were identified on the verdict form: intentional interference with property…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.