South of Mkt. Cmty. Action Network v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 174·33 Cal. App. 5th 321
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 2019A151521California13,562 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Margulies, J.

*327 After preparing an environmental impact report (EIR) and holding public hearings, the City and County of San Francisco (City) approved a mixed-use business and residential project proposed by real parties in interest Forest City California Residential Development, Inc. and Hearst Communications, Inc. (collectively Forest City) in the area bounded by Mission, Fifth, Howard, and Sixth Streets in San Francisco. In approving the project, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors also voted to amend the San Francisco general plan to establish a Fifth and Mission Special Use District and approve the development agreement. South of Market Community Action Network (SOMCAN), Save Our SoMa (SOS), and Friends of Boeddeker Park (collectively plaintiffs) challenged the environmental review by filing a petition for writ of mandate *182 in the superior court. The trial court denied relief. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Forest City proposed the construction of a mixed-use development, the Fifth and Mission Project (the 5M Project or the project), covering four acres in downtown San Francisco. The 5M Project seeks to provide office, retail, cultural, educational, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.