Morales

People v. Morales

Good Law
245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 352·33 Cal. App. 5th 800
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2019A152525California4,096 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brown, J.

*802 Found by the Napa County Sheriff's Department in unauthorized possession of a white van, defendant Adrian Morales (Morales) was charged with several offenses, including unlawful driving or taking of a vehicle ( Veh. Code, § 10851 ). In addition, the People alleged that Morales suffered three prior convictions in Nevada for robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery. At trial, a jury found Morales guilty on all counts. In a separate proceeding, the trial court determined that two of the three prior strike allegations against Morales were true. Morales was sentenced to 32 months in state prison.

Morales appeals, arguing on various grounds that his Vehicle Code 1 section 10851 conviction merited only misdemeanor punishment. In the alternative, Morales contends that the trial court violated his due process rights by failing to instruct the jury on a purported defense. Finally, Morales contends that the trial court reviewed an ambiguous record of his Nevada convictions in order to find true the prior strike allegations against him, thus violating the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We agree with this final argument, remand on that basis, and otherwise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.