People v. J.G. (In re J.G.)

Good Law
245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 587·33 Cal. App. 5th 1084
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 4, 20192d Juv. No. B287487California2,096 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Yegan, J.

*1086 The internet is a source of great knowledge and communication of ideas. Unfortunately, *589 it can be used for purposes which are not so wonderful. Here the trial court required a juvenile to consent to a search of electronic devices as a correctional tool in the juvenile's reformation and rehabilitation. It seems obvious that the juvenile court is trying to keep the juvenile from accessing information which may kindle his interest in racial hatred and bigotry. This is such a laudable goal that it is difficult to see the merit in academic counter arguments. Resolution of the issue should not turn on an academic analysis of privacy considerations and the relationship to terms and conditions of juvenile probation. Rather, the approach should be a practical one to serve this juvenile who is in need of monitoring for his own good. This kid is in trouble. He needs guidance. He does not need to access racial hatred which is so readily available on the internet.

J.G. participated in a fist fight at his school and, when a teacher tried to stop the fight, used a racial slur against that teacher. He called the teacher a "nigger." He admitted in juvenile court that he committed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.