People v. Superior Court

Good Law
245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 787·34 Cal. App. 5th 75
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 2019D074028California4,047 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Huffman, J.

*77 The San Diego County District Attorney petitions for a writ of mandate and/or prohibition challenging the superior court's order directing the district attorney to turn over to defense habeas counsel the prosecution's jury selection notes, contending the materials are privileged work product not subject to discovery. We are called upon to determine whether these notes, when referenced during a Batson / Wheeler 1 hearing by a prosecutor offering a neutral reason for exercising a peremptory strike, are discoverable by the defendant as part of postconviction writ of habeas corpus discovery. We conclude they are, and we deny the petition.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1994, a jury convicted Bryan Maurice Jones of the first degree murders of JoAnn S. and Sophia G. ( Pen. Code, 2 §§ 187, 189 ), attempted murder of *78 Maria R. and Karen M. ( §§ 664, 187 ), and the forcible rape, sodomy and oral copulation of Karen M. (§§ 261, subd. (a)(2), 286, subd. (c), 288a, subd. (c).) The jury also sustained an allegation that Jones used a deadly weapon in the attempt to murder Maria R. (§ 12022, subd. (b)), along with special circumstance allegations: Jones murdered JoAnn S. and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.