Stamps

People v. Stamps

Bad Law
245 Cal. Rptr. 3d 821·34 Cal. App. 5th 117
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 2019A154091California2,966 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Pollak, J.

*119 In exchange for a stipulated nine-year sentence and the dismissal of other counts, defendant William Stamps plead no contest to one count of residential burglary ( Pen. Code, 1 § 459) and admitted a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subds. (a)(1) ). The court sentenced defendant to the stipulated prison term, which consisted of the low term of two years for the burglary doubled pursuant to sections 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1) and 667, subdivision (e)(1) and a five-year enhancement pursuant to section 667, subdivision (a)(1). On appeal, defendant contends the matter must be remanded so that the trial court may exercise its discretion to strike the five-year serious felony conviction enhancement pursuant to recently enacted Senate Bill No. 1393. (Legis. Counsel's Dig., Sen. Bill No. 1393 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) Stats. 2018, ch. 1013, §§ 1, 2.) We *823 agree and, accordingly, remand for a new sentencing hearing to decide whether to exercise that discretion.

Background

Defendant was sentenced on January 10, 2018. On March 29, 2018, defendant timely filed a notice of appeal. His request for a certificate of probable cause was denied.

*120 At the time of defendant's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.