Dudek

Dudek v. Dudek

Bad Law
246 Cal. Rptr. 3d 27·34 Cal. App. 5th 154
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 10, 2019D073491California6,696 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aaron, J.

*158 I.

INTRODUCTION

Petitioner David Dudek (David) 1 appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court sustained the demurrer of respondents Anne Kebisek Dudek, 2 Tiffany Guzman, Jeanette M. Kebisek, Mary J. Kebisek, Guillermo Andrade, Maria Sanchez, Ora H. Day, Tonya Courtney, and Michael Quinn (the respondents) to David's petition (the Petition), filed pursuant to the Probate Code, to recover money distributed to the respondents in accordance with the beneficiary designation of Genworth Life Insurance Policy #5804946 (the Policy), which covered the life of J.D. Dudek (J.D.), the Petitioner's brother.

According to David, in late 2009, J.D. created and executed the J.D. Dudek Life Insurance Trust (the Trust), an irrevocable *29 life insurance trust that named David as the trustee. David asserts that the Policy is listed as an asset of the Trust, to be held and administered in accordance with the Trust's terms. According to the Petition, the Trust designates David and his sister, Sharon Van de Grift, as the residual beneficiaries of the Trust who, pursuant to the terms of the Trust, would be entitled to the proceeds of the Policy.

According to the allegations of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.