Cnty. of Orange v. Seneca Ins. Co.

Good Law
247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 72·35 Cal. App. 5th 194
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 2019G055660California1,369 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

*74 *196 This case requires us to interpret Penal Code section 1308, subdivision (a), 1 which concerns a person or company's ability to act as a surety on bail when a prior summary judgment against it stemming from a bail forfeiture remains unpaid. We find the statutory language is unambiguous. It specifies, without exception, that if an appeal bond is not posted and a bail forfeiture related summary judgment remains unpaid after 30 days from service of the notice of entry of judgment, the indebted person or company may not be accepted as a surety on bail. In this case it is undisputed there is an unpaid summary judgment against appellant Seneca Insurance Company. Consequently, we affirm the trial court's order suspending its ability to act as a surety.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

To secure a criminal defendant's release from custody, appellant posted a $ 100,000 bail bond. The defendant later failed to appear in court as ordered, so the trial court ordered the bond forfeited, and the clerk sent appellant and its bond agent a notice of forfeiture. Appellant did not thereafter bring defendant to court and it made no attempt to exonerate the bond within the statutory time period…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.