Astorga-Lider

People v. Astorga-Lider

Good Law
247 Cal. Rptr. 3d 544·35 Cal. App. 5th 646
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 2, 2019D073992California3,676 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Huffman, J.

*648 Yolanda Astorga-Lider pled guilty to six felony counts, including two counts of violating *546 Penal Code 1 section 115, subdivision (a). One of those counts, grand theft (§ 487; count 6), involved Astorga-Lider encumbering certain real property, purchased by Nohemi and Jose Lorenzana, 2 with a fraudulent deed of trust. The subject deed of trust listed Sunil Deo as the lender.

After Astorga-Lider's guilty plea, the People moved, under section 115, subdivision (e), for an order declaring certain record instruments void, including the deed of trust listing Deo as the lender (Deo Deed of Trust). After multiple rounds of briefing as well as considering evidence and information submitted in support of and opposition to the People's motion, the superior court granted the motion. In doing so, the court found the Deo Deed of Trust void.

Deo appeals the order declaring the Deo Deed of Trust void, contending the People's motion was procedurally improper; the Deo Deed of Trust is not a false or forged document under section 115 ; at most, the Deo Deed of Trust is voidable, not void; civil court, not criminal court, is the appropriate forum for adjudication of the validity of the Deo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.