Swanson

Swanson v. Cnty. of Riverside

Good Law
248 Cal. Rptr. 3d 476·36 Cal. App. 5th 361
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2019D075081California4,429 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Huffman, J.

*364 INTRODUCTION

Brandon M. was taken to Riverside County Medical Center by the Corona Police Department for an involuntary hold, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 5150. He was released before *479 72 hours had elapsed, and he returned home, where he bludgeoned three people to death with a baseball bat. Surviving family members, who are successors in interest or heirs, (collectively Respondents) filed lawsuits against the County of Riverside (County) for his release, alleging negligence. The County filed a special motion to dismiss under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute. The County contended the complaints should be struck because they alleged harm arising from protected activity and because Respondents could not show a reasonable probability their suit would be successful on the merits. Respondents countered that the County's actions did not arise from any petition or speech-related activity and so were not subject to the anti-SLAPP statute. The trial court denied the County's motion, and the County appealed.

The County contends the trial court improperly denied its special motion to strike because (1) the procedures outlined in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.