People v. Williams

Good Law
250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 508·37 Cal. App. 5th 602
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2019B290506California1,251 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiley, J.

*603 We confront a direct and widening court conflict over whether defendants who made a plea deal must obtain a certificate of probable cause before asking, on appeal, for a remand for resentencing under Senate Bill No. 1393 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.), which we call SB 1393. The Supreme Court has taken up but not yet decided this conflict. We join with the courts ruling a certificate of probable cause is necessary. We dismiss this appeal because Christopher Williams never tried to obtain a certificate of probable cause. All statutory citations are to the Penal Code.

I

We summarize some factual background.

*604 As part of a plea deal, Williams pleaded no contest to two felony counts of robbery. Williams admitted a strike offense conviction. In May 2018, the trial court sentenced Williams to 30 years and four months in prison. Five of these years were due to a prior serious felony conviction enhancement under section 667, subdivision (a)(1). Without requesting or receiving a certificate of probable cause, Williams filed a notice of appeal on May 31, 2018.

The law changed later in 2018. At the time of sentencing, section 1385(b) prohibited the court from striking any prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.