Sheen

Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
250 Cal. Rptr. 3d 677·38 Cal. App. 5th 346
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 5, 2019B289003California4,645 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wiley, J.

*347 Homeowners in mortgage trouble may try to negotiate a better deal. If mortgage modification negotiations fail and the borrower falls behind, the lender may foreclose, sell the house, and evict the homeowner. In a nutshell, this happened to borrower Kwang Sheen with his lender Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells). Sheen sued Wells in tort for negligent mortgage *348 modification and other claims. The trial court sustained Wells's demurrer, partly because Wells did not owe Sheen a duty in tort during contract negotiation.

The issue of whether a tort duty exists for mortgage modification has divided California courts for years. The California Supreme Court has yet to resolve this division. We must take sides.

*678 We join with the old rule: no tort duty during contract negotiations. Our small contribution to this extensive debate is to use the general approach of the recent Supreme Court decision in Southern California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal.5th 391 , 247 Cal.Rptr.3d 632 , 441 P.3d 881 ( Gas Leak Cases ). The Gas Leak Cases decision was not about mortgage modifications, but it gives us guiding sources of law about whether to extend tort duties when, as here, there is no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.