Clifford v. Quest Software Inc.

Good Law
251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 269·38 Cal. App. 5th 745
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2019G055858California3,859 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Aronson, J.

*747 The question posed in this appeal is whether an employee's claim against his employer for unfair competition under Business and Professions Code section 17200 1 (the UCL) is arbitrable. The employee brought various wage and hour claims against his employer, and the employer moved to compel arbitration based on the parties' arbitration agreement. The trial court granted the motion in part and ordered to arbitration every cause of action except the employee's UCL claim, which the court concluded was not arbitrable. In so ruling, the court cited without discussion our Supreme Court's holding in Cruz v. PacifiCare Health Systems, Inc. (2003) 30 Cal.4th 303 , 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 58 , 66 P.3d 1157 ( Cruz ).

*748 We reverse that portion of the trial court's order. Assuming Cruz remains good law - a question we need not answer here - Cruz at most stands for the proposition that UCL claims for "public" injunctive relief are not arbitrable. ( Cruz, supra , at pp. 315-316, 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 58 , 66 P.3d 1157 .) Cruz does not bar arbitration of a UCL claim for private injunctive relief or restitution, which is precisely what the UCL claim here seeks. The employee's UCL claim therefore is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.