Burns

People v. Burns

Good Law
251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 442·38 Cal. App. 5th 776
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2019D074536California5,330 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dato, J.

*445 *779 Derrick Lyle Burns struck his girlfriend and led law enforcement on a high-speed chase. A jury convicted him of false imprisonment, evading a police vehicle, infliction of corporal injury on a spouse or cohabitant, and two counts of assault with a deadly weapon; Burns admitted two prior strikes. After dismissing one of the strikes, the trial court sentenced Burns to a total term of 19 years, eight months in state prison.

Burns seeks reversal of his convictions on counts 2 and 3 (evading a police officer and inflicting corporal injury) on the basis that his counsel conceded guilt during opening and closing statements without his express consent. Consistent with our recent decision in People v. Marsh (2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 474 , 249 Cal.Rptr.3d 749 ( Marsh ), we reject this claim as contrary to controlling precedent. However, we accept Burns's remaining claim that the case should be conditionally reversed for the trial court to consider his eligibility for mental health diversion pursuant to newly enacted Penal Code section 1001.36. 1 As more fully set forth in the Disposition, we conditionally reverse the judgment with directions for further proceedings under section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.