Moses

People v. Moses

Good Law
251 Cal. Rptr. 3d 462·38 Cal. App. 5th 757
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 14, 2019G055621California8,232 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Goethals, J.

*758 A jury convicted Antonio Moses, III, of human trafficking of a minor (count 1, Pen. Code, § 236.1, subd. (c)(1) [hereafter, *759 § 236.1(c) ]; 1 attempted pimping of a minor (count 2; §§ 664, subd. (a); 266h, subd. (b)(1)), and pandering (count 3, § 266i, subd. (a)). In bifurcated proceedings, the trial court found Moses previously suffered a strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(e); 1170.12, subds. (b), (c)(1)), but dismissed four prior prison term allegations (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) for lack of evidence. The court then imposed the high term of 12 years on count 1, doubled to 24 years based on the prior strike, and stayed under section 654 the imposition of midterm sentences for counts 2 and 3.

The jury in count 1 convicted Moses based on language in section 236.1(c), which defines the crime of human trafficking to include the conduct of "a person who ... attempts to cause, induce, or persuade, a person who is a minor at the time of commission of the offense" to engage in a commercial sex act. In enacting section 236.1, the electorate specified that a defendant's mistaken belief that the minor was of age is not a defense to attempted human trafficking. ( § 236.1, subd. (f).)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.