Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.

Good Law
672 F.3d 661·2012 WL 688552·2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4377
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 201212-15005California6,477 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wardlaw, J.

The State of Nevada, through its Attorney General, Catherine Cortez Masto, filed this parens patriae lawsuit against Bank of America Corporation and several related entities (collectively, “Bank of America”) in Clark County District Court. Nevada alleges that Bank of America misled Nevada consumers about the terms and operation of its home mortgage modification and foreclosure processes, in violation of the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Nev.Rev.Stat. §§ 598.0903-.0999. Nevada also alleges that Bank of America violated an existing consent judgment (“Consent Judgment”) in a prior case between Nevada and several of Bank of America’s subsidiaries, entered in Clark County District Court.

Bank of America removed this action to federal district court, asserting federal subject matter jurisdiction as either a “class action” or “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1382 (d), and as arising under federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . Denying Nevada’s motion to remand, the federal district court concluded that it has jurisdiction over this action as a CAFA “class action,” but not as a “mass action,” and that it also has federal question…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.