Estate of Love

Good Law
1 Coffey 537
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoApril 10, 1883No. 2,287California1,334 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Coffey, J.

This is a motion to confirm the report of the referee to whom the matter of the final account of the executor was referred, and to settle said account in accordance with said report, and for a decree distributing the property of said estate to the parties entitled thereto. The motion comes before this department on stipulation. The parties interested are the executor, John Lord Love; Leila L. Foster, who appears as the successor in interest by purchase *548 of Martha C. M. Love, the widow and residuary legatee and devisee of the decedent; the Pacific Bank and the Hibernia Savings and Loan Society, mortgagees.

On the hearing of the motion the executor appeared by John S. Bugbee, Esq., and T. B. Bishop, Esq., who opposed confirmation of the report of the referee; and Leila L. Poster, contestant, appeared by Geo. R. B. Hayes, Esq.

As to claim for extraordinary services: There is no error here. In my judgment the executor is entitled to no compensation for extraordinary services.

It is true he performed a duty advantageous to the estate, but he would have been grossly negligent if he had not used his ability in and knowledge of the law to have done so; and it appears a particular…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.