In re Estate of Blanc

Good Law
3 Coffey 71
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoMay 5, 1892No. 11,082California2,203 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Coffey, J.

(Addressing the Jury.) 1. Whenever nine of your number agree on an answer to an issue, it becomes your verdict on that issue. Your verdict must be in writ *73 ing, signed by your foreman, and nine of you must agree on that verdict.

2. You are the sole and exclusive judges of the value or effect of the evidence; your power of judging of the effect of the evidence is not arbitrary, but to be exercised with legal' discretion, and in subordination to the rules of evidence.

3. You are not bound to decide in conformity with the declarations of any number of witnesses which do not produce conviction in your minds, against a less number, or even against a presumption from the evidence satisfying your minds. Evidence is to be estimated not only by its own intrinsic weight, but also according to the evidence which it is in the power of one side to- produce, and of the other side to contradict. A witness is presumed to speak the truth; but this presumption may be repelled by the manner in which he testifies or by the character of his testimony, or by evidence affecting his character for truth, honesty and integrity, or by contradictory evidence; and you,.the jury, are the exclusive judges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.