In re Estate of Griffiths

Good Law
3 Coffey 545
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoNovember 18, 1895No. 16,436California1,492 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Coffey, J.

These are applications for letters of administration upon the estate of Dominick E. Griffiths; one application being filed by the public administrator, and one by W. S. Phelps at the request of the brothers of the decedent, who are his sole heirs at law, and who are all nonresidents of the state of California.

The application of Phelps should be denied and letters issued to the public administrator, for the reasons:

So far as Judge Slack’s decision is concerned, counsel contend that department 10 being of equal jurisdiction with this department, that, while his decision would be the law of the particular estate in which it was made, it would not be and is not authority in this ease. Counsel further contend that this department will not be governed by any decision of Judge Slack, unless the reason of such decision addressed itself to the mind of this court, and this court is convinced that such decision is a proper exposition of the law.

In the case at bar, whatever possible criticism might be made upon a reversal by the supreme court would attach to the judge of this department, even though his decision should be based upon the prior decision of Judge Slack as authority; and it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.