In re Estate of Dama

Good Law
5 Coffey 24
Superior Court of California, County of San FranciscoJanuary 30, 1892No. 6972California3,993 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Coffey, J.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.

On January 3, 1889, Sarah Randall, hy her

attorneys, Joseph P. Kelly, Esq., and H. I. Kowalsky, Esq.,

*27 filed in this court a petition praying for the revocation of the probate of the Will of Luigi Dama, in which she set forth that Luigi Dama died intestate in San Francisco on the twentieth day of January, 1888, being at that time a resident of that city and county and leaving estate, therein of real and personal property; that at the time of his death he was a widower, his wife, Wealthy B. J. Dama, having predeceased him on the sixth day of November, 1882, in the said city and county; that she left surviving her Luigi Dama, her husband, and Sarah Randall, her mother, the contestant; also brothers and sisters—Edward W. Randall, of Bath, Maine, aged fifty-eight years, Benjamin Randall, Boston, Massachusetts, .aged forty-five years, Frank H. Randall, aged thirty-two years, and Jennie Forbes, Boston, Massachusetts, aged forty-six years; that at the time of the death of Luigi Dama he left property which was acquired by the joint labor of himself and his spouse, Wealthy, and that during his marriage he acquired all of the property of which he died seised;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.